-
QUESTION:
Do American men get freaked out about commitment when they spend too much time with their GF?
We've seen all the movies, chick flicks, romance films, about how men freak out about commitment and women seem to LoOove it (i.e in "How to lose a guy in 10 days," Kate Hudson's methods are all about trying to scare Matt McC. by putting "female products" in his bathroom and pretending to be super lovey-dovey).
My boyfriend and I have been together for two years now. I am in my mid-twenties; he in his mid-thirties. We are talking about marriage, and I want to make sure that we have a strong, healthy marriage from the start, before we take the next step. Although I can see myself being happy with what we have, I fear him (being a male) might find it exciting and intense in the beginning and then "too much" later on.
This relationship is the longest he's ever been in, and in the past he showed signs of commitment anxiety, but for the most part he seems committed to me and loving. I don't want to "punish" him for his commitment issues (he had a difficult childhood with his mother).
I'm fine with spending a lot of time together, and showing him a lot of affection (like giving him lots of kisses and hugs) because I've done the "long term relationship" thing and don't think I have any issues committing to someone.
The reason why I say "American" men is because I don't want to peg ALL men to be a certain way and wonder if the fear of commitment (and the idea that men really want independence) is a societal culture thing.
Do you believe American males tend to feel "trapped" when they spend too much time with a woman? So how much is too much? How do we as couples avoid falling into this pitfall?
Thank you for answering.
-
ANSWER:
That can't even be pinned to "American" men -- because it's not like they're all the same. There are men all over the world who have commitment problems, because it's in their nature. It sounds like you've got something good though, and if you don't feel comfortable confronting about it, I don't see much of a reason to. If you're going to get married, obviously he isn't having the same "issues" as other guys (who flinch at the very thought of holy matrimony), and I wish you two the best of luck.
-
QUESTION:
Men and women: When does a couple spend too much time together?
My boyfriend and I have been together for two years now. I am in my mid-twenties; he in his mid-thirties. We are talking about marriage, and I want to make sure that we have a strong, healthy marriage from the start, before we take the next step. Although I can see myself being happy with what we have, I fear him (being a male) might find it exciting and intense in the beginning and then "too much" later on.
This relationship is the longest he's ever been in, and in the past he showed signs of commitment anxiety (like saying he wants us to stay independent and for me to move in, but not to sell my apartment because the idea of me doing so is like "leaving all of my independent self behind," which he's not yet ready for), but for the most part he seems committed to me and loving. I don't want to "punish" him for his commitment issues (he had a difficult childhood with his mother), and I don't know if it's my own insecurity shining through, but it's definitely something I think about.
I'm fine with spending a lot of time together, because I've done the "long term relationship" thing and don't think I have any issues committing to someone.
I don't believe in the ideas that "there's never too much time together if you're in love!"- I feel they're too simplistic and do not encompass the complexity of a relationship between two individual people as progressive, independent creatures. I enjoy talking about marriage with him, but don't want to do it if we're straying off the right path.
So, do you believe American males tend to feel "trapped" when they spend too much time with a woman? So how much is too much? How do we as couples avoid falling into this pitfall?
Thank you for answering.
-
QUESTION:
Why does Sarah Palin hate women who have been raped?
“Despite denials by the Palin campaign, new evidence proves that as mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, Sarah Palin had a direct hand in imposing fees to pay for post-sexual assault medical exams conducted by the city to gather evidence.
Palin's role is now confirmed by Wasilla City budget documents available online.
Under Sarah Palin's administration, Wasilla cut funds that had previously paid for the medical exams and began charging victims or their health insurers the 0 to 00 fees. Although Palin spokeswoman Maria Comella wrote USA Today earlier this week that the GOP vice presidential nominee "does not believe, nor has she ever believed, that rape victims should have to pay for an evidence-gathering test...To suggest otherwise is a deliberate misrepresentation of her commitment to supporting victims and bringing violent criminals to justice," Palin, as mayor, fired police chief Irl Stambaugh and replaced him with Charlie Fannon, who with Palin's knowledge, slashed the budget for the exams and began charging the city's victims of sexual assault. The city budget documents demonstrate Palin read and signed off on the new budget. A year later, alarmed Alaska lawmakers passed legislation outlawing the practice.
News of the controversial policy has leaked slowly into the press this week as the presidential campaign has heated up and Palin's record has been subject to increasing scrutiny. The practice of charging rape victims has called into question Palin's stated commitment to women's issues, her judgment as an executive and her honesty about her record.
The story of the Wasilla policy has made its way from comments on Daily Kos to the pages of USA Today. But clear evidence suggesting Palin knew Wasilla was charging the victims of sexual assault has been hard to find. Placing the city budget records, however, alongside a timetable of Palin's firing Chief Stambaugh and hiring Chief Fannon makes it clear the policy was put in place as a direct result of Palin's leadership.
The mayor of Wasilla before Sarah Palin, John C. Stein, was also a Republican, though the office was and continues to be non-partisan. Mayor Stein was defeated by Sarah Palin in a campaign that brought in the NRA, Republican partisans, and a whisper campaign that Mayor Stein was Jewish (he is a Christian, but is "proud of such a reputation"). He now runs the Sitka Sound Science Center, a marine research facility in Sitka, Alaska.
Mayor Stein told OffTheBus that he didn't "think victims were billed while [he] was mayor," but that he wasn't certain. He did mention that "Wasilla participated in establishing a Sexual Assault Response Team to set-up a one-stop forensic exam room for victims," evidence of a pro-victim police department. In order to confirm his assertion about the billing policy, he recommended I contact current police chief Angella Long for confirmation. She did not return my request for comment.
However, I was able to eventually track down Irl Stambaugh, police chief of Wasilla from the founding of the department until Sarah Palin fired him for "not fully supporting her efforts to govern." Stambaugh sued for breach of contract, but lost when a federal judge ruled that "police chiefs serve at the behest of the mayor unless otherwise specified." He later served as the executive director of the Alaska Police Standards Council.
It turns out that Wasilla did not bill sexual assault victims for the cost of rape exams while Irl Stambaugh was chief of police. As chief, he had included a line item in the budget to pay for the cost of such exams. He had only just heard about the Mayor Palin/Chief Fannon policy today, and was just as shocked to hear about it as I was.
Checking the budget confirmed former Chief Stambaugh's claim. He had included a contingency of ,000 in his budget for the department's 1st year of existence (1993-1994), ,000 for 1994-1995 and 1995-1996, and ,000 for his final year as police chief in 1996-1997, spending ,625.
Duwayne Charles Fannon, his replacement, halved the budget request in 1997-1998, with a request of ,298, spending ,454. However, it seems he began the "victim pays" policy in the 1998-1999 fiscal year. That year, he requested ,000 but spent only 5. This data can be found in the Document Central section of Wasilla's website.
The Document for the 1998-1999 fiscal year begins with a message "To the Citizens of the City of Wasilla:"
The comprehensive annual financial report of the City of Wasilla for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999, is hereby submitted. The City's Finance Department prepared the report. Responsibility for both the accuracy of the data, and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with the City. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed data is accurate in all material respects and is reported in a manner designed to fairly present the financial position and results of operations of the various funds a
-
ANSWER:
I think it's a case of her totally failing to understand or empathize with ANYTHING outside her experience. I really do believe Atticus Finch when he says "sometimes, you just have to walk a mile in the other person's shoes..." - I don't think Sarah Palin is capable of doing that. I don't think she can understand that a 00 bill could defiantly deter some one who was just horribly violated from seeking help.
She scares me... friends of mine tell me she literally does hate gays... I'm looking that up now....
-
QUESTION:
Your feelings on the Women "hook ups" issue?
I've been hearing a lot about a book written by a woman on her beliefs that while women over recent years have grown more "independent", "freedom" even "power" especially regarding hookups/ casual sex to her it has been at a price. Casual Sex or hook ups once tied to bad boys but that this new found power has cost women the ability to know the benefits & signs of a more loving & caring relationship making women either afraid of commitment because of being scared or the belief that commitment will some how take away this new independence & hold her back. She believes that while its good that women have gained this freedom she worries about what seems to be the lack to see the “signs” or benefits of a real loving relationship.
She says that it seem women still want the fairy tale relationship but accepted that it’s just a Fairytale & settled for casual sex as ok but when offered a potential real relationship they see it as negative instead of the positive. Often running from it preventing them from finding that happiness & fairytale. Do you agree? Women especially. Hope I have not offended anyone.
I see your point but am torn as to the drama I mean drama is unavoidable but yet it can often come in large amount especially when younger. I've always sort of tried to keep sex in the background not because I dont love it but because I think that's often where most of the drama comes from. I guess I can see why that might be bad but relationships are ruined because of drama & most of the drama can be avoided for the most part I think. I've just heard & seen to many women appear to run from good things even things they talk about wanting & yet can't understand why it seems so simply.
-
ANSWER:
The lack of equality on this issue in the first place was due to socialization; men were afforded freedom to do as they wished whilst women were not. Now women can do what they want and act as they wish, just like men. This is not the problem; this is the solution. Equality is paramount. We are all human.
-
QUESTION:
He's not that into me?
It's a bit long and I would really appreciate your reading.
I know it's all up to my own judgment, but I wanna have more inputs on my bf (or whoever, we're sort of on a break, I've just moved back home) of 2 months. He's much older and we were colleagues.
We're not 'in love', we never said the L word to each other (he said to me once when we had a fight and I was about to dump him). But I obviously have some feelings for him. I'm not sure how he feels about me.
positive signs
1. Extremely nice (cooks, cleans, pays for every meal, bought me groceries when I didn't even ask, polished my boots, bought me new boots, took me to the hospital, always goes to the restaurants/places I want and cooks whatever I want to eat etc.)
2. good memory (my bd, my favourites, my work stuff, whatever I said)
3. Although the relationship started with sex (and I originally intended it to be a one night stand but he kept asking me out afterwards), he has shown intimate gestures outside sex (frequent kisses on the forehead, eskimo kiss, holding hand, massage my whole body)
4. carried my suitcases and saw me off at the airport after I decided to come home,we kissed as a couple and as if I would just be on a short trip
5. honest in a sense of telling me everything about his previous relationships (even though they were somtimes promiscuous - an affair with a married woman, past experiences with hookers)
negative signs
1. Still lives with another woman, but insists that they're finished for a while before he met me. It was a long term thing so he can't kick her out (she has her own place) neither can he brought me in.
EXTREMELY FISHY I know, but his argument has a point. How could he spend nights/weekends with me then if they were still 'together'? I went to his holiday house and he came to my place. He kept saying she has already moved some of her stuff back, but a month has passed, SHE'S STILL THERE!!
2. Inconsistency: he was the one who OFFERED to me to move in with him (cos I'm a foreigner) to solve the apartment issue. I accepted his offer and gave up my accommodation, turned out, I still couldn't move in cos SHE'S STILL THERE!! Why bothered offering then?
3. He promised to give her the deadline, but couldn't promise I would be able to move in right away when I come back next month.
4. unlike most guys, he appreciated my looks more than my brain.
5. He seems emotionally detached at times (like lack of surprise that I decided to come home), but maybe it's just his personality and his age.
6. He's almost 50 and has never been married and had kids, obviously he has commitment issues. He said i was too impatient with the pace of our relationship. He said he has only me since he met me but he still felt pushed by my approach to commitment.
but before you say anything, we both used each other for sex, not just him...but it doesn't mean there aren't feelings involved...I just wonder if it will develop into something deeper.
THANKS SO MUCH!!!!!!!!!!
-
ANSWER:
well sounds to me all thoe negative points are genuine negative points that is causing all the problems.
however all the positive points seem to small and trivial that they are not positive ones really, they seem to be the ones u say to urself to make urself feel good. agree? 10 of those positive points outweigh one of ur negative ones. u need to find 100 more postive ones of those level.
understand? are u fooling urself?
-
QUESTION:
Will he ever commit?
I've been dating this guy for a little over a year now. He is in the army and just told me that he signed up for Special Forces training. Something he really wants to do! Which would involve him having to move to the east cost! We love each other. He says it. I say it. He says that he wants to help me raise my daughter. She isn't his. But he's been with me sense she was 2 moths old. He is very sweet to me and my girl. We are family! Says he cares for US a lot. If he makes the training. He will be gone for 2 years. But he says he'll be back. He has had commitment issues in the past. The last girl asked for a ring right before he went to boot camp.He said he wasn't ready for that and went off to the army. she later cheated on him with his best friend. Does my man use running away, to get away from woman that want commitment? Is my man afraid of commitment. Or just being cautious.... We are serious about each other. But i just cant stop thinking about needing some kind of reassurance! He says time will tell if we're meant to be. Am I just a toy for the army guy?
I need this relationship to be validated before he goes. So i can have some peace that he wont go shopping for something else.
-
QUESTION:
He said there's a lot on his mind and that I "deserve more than he can give me right now" Hmmmm. ?
We've been dating almost 4 months. He's 34, never been married, admits to commitment issues, has said from the beginning that I am a different kind of woman than he usually dates, (in a good way) and wanted to try for something more serious with me. First 3 months were wonderful, seeing each other every other day, talking 2 or 3 times a day by phone (him making most of the calls). About 3 weeks ago, I noticed a definite change, going out with his friends more, seeing me less (2 or 3 times a week), and calling less, (once per day or texting and not calling.) There have been no arguments or drama though he had talked alot about "how did he end up with a good woman" and "what am I going to do with you?" Monday, (2 nights ago), he hadn't called all day, though he had texted. So I called him late that evening, to which he sent the call to voice-mail, and I texted to ask if he was okay. He replies with " A lot is on his mind so he's been laying low by himself and that I deserve so much more than he can give me right now." I ask if there was someone else, to which he replied "NO!" I replied that "I truly cared for him more than he knew and would give him some space, that if he wanted to break things off I'd respect that but I think it would be a loss for both of us." He didn't reply to the text but called yesterday just to say "hello" and texted today commenting on it being a "nice day." I'll also mention that he has a history of addiction, (alcohol/substance abuse) and there are a few signs of perhaps a relapse in that area of his life, although he tries to keep it from me. What do you think's really going on with him and what should I do? I have not initiated contact since my "serious" text Monday night. Thanks for the help!
-
ANSWER:
He is old enough to know what he wants, unless his judgment is clouded by drugs or alcohol, or an ex. You may care too much about him, and this would make you codependent. It's hard to explain. If you love someone with an addiction, be very wary of getting serious. Only you can decide if you can continue this relationship.
He may be hiding behind a bottle, as they say. And you cannot rescue him from his addiction.
-
QUESTION:
Is he just letting me down easy or does this "you deserve more" line ring true?
We've been dating almost 4 months. He's 34, never been married, admits to commitment issues, has said from the beginning that I am a different kind of woman than he usually dates, (in a good way) and wanted to try for something more serious with me. First 3 months were wonderful, seeing each other every other day, talking 2 or 3 times a day by phone (him making most of the calls). About 3 weeks ago, I noticed a definite change, going out with his friends more, seeing me less (2 or 3 times a week), and calling less, (once per day or texting and not calling.) There have been no arguments or drama though he had talked alot about "how did he end up with a good woman" and "what am I going to do with you?" Monday, (2 nights ago), he hadn't called all day, though he had texted. So I called him late that evening, to which he sent the call to voice-mail, and I texted to ask if he was okay. He replies with " A lot is on his mind so he's been laying low by himself and that I deserve so much more than he can give me right now." I ask if there was someone else, to which he replied "NO!" I replied that "I truly cared for him more than he knew and would give him some space, that if he wanted to break things off I'd respect that but I think it would be a loss for both of us." He didn't reply to the text but called yesterday just to say "hello" and texted today commenting on it being a "nice day." I'll also mention that he has a history of addiction, (alcohol/substance abuse) and there are a few signs of perhaps a relapse in that area of his life, although he tries to keep it from me. What do you think's really going on with him and what should I do? I have not initiated contact since my "serious" text Monday night. Thanks for the help!
-
ANSWER:
I think there are 2 real answers to whats going on.
1. Hes got someone else or want to go play the field more (lost the kick of not playing the field. )
2. Hes using again or almost did.
And you have 3 options, go were he normally goes (if you know were that is) and spy. Or call him up and say ok what gives once and for all (what I would recommend). Or just throw your hand up in the air and see what happens. (the hardest of them all if you ask me) But the way that hes acting I would say maybe hes not feeling it as much as you are. But he wants to kind of keep you in waiting like hes got something else going on. Good luck hope it works out!
-
QUESTION:
Single female 27-31 yrs old...... bad sign ?
I'm sorry if anyone reading this falls into this category it is not meant to stereotype it is just largely my own observations.
I'm a 26 yr old male and I've talked to females in the early twenties to early thirties.
Initially I found some younger females (22-24) to have maturity issues so I broadened my spectrum to women in their late twenties to early thirties.
Unfortunately I've found that the latter group has commitment issues and also some of the older females really have expections that may not be realistic because no guy is a model/wealth trust baby/neurosurgeon all at once (yes I'm kidding).
It is different for a male to be in hat position due to the gender roles in society but females are largely pursued and usually I've noticed marry by 28,29.
I'm not making a broad statement because I'm sure some women have literally had the luxury to meet the worst guys out there but it's kinda a red flag to me and makes me wonder why they are still single.
-
ANSWER:
Not a bad sign, it just defintiely comes with baggage of sum sort like u exampled, lol...Just like Dory said in Finding Nemo, lol...Just keep swimming. U will find the right one.
-
QUESTION:
In the future will there be double families?
I, ...being a thinker and all, have thought of a concept which just might mark the beginning of a revolution in the way we look at families. Perhaps in the future, two men and two women (preferably bisexual) would all marry each other. can step in as marriage partners at both weddings, then just do their business behind closed doors. They would sign a regular contract but later agree on cheating on each other within their circle.....This would dramatically lower the number of cases of HIV given that the individuals will have freedom of choice and therefore will not try to cheat outside their circle and end up catching an STD from someone else as a result........and they'd also be able to have babies but within their individual families of which they choose. so that way they can procreate if they wanted to...... now i fully understand that some would say that my idea is absurd and it would never happen, and that it may also cause a number of commitment issues .I'm just saying ..wouldn't you want more than one spouse?
-
QUESTION:
Why is he doing this?
I work with a guy who I like, as a friend and more, but we haven't been able to take things further as he is currently in a relationship (a very unstable one). We flirt like crazy but it's just how we are. When he and his girlfriend broke up again last month he admitted to her that he was attracted to me. She's a very jealous woman so the consequences have been quite big. She'll always turn up at our work when she knows we're both on shift, he's not allowed to contact me at all, had to delete me from social networking sites etc etc ... I can understand her reactions, but I can't understand him. I may be starting to see another guy, as I haven't got any attachments. The friend I work with knows this, as we're quite close, but he seems to have to put little jibes in where he can. This guy turned up when I was on shift the other night and gave me a kiss goodnight. My friend couldn't stop making little comments about my 'new boyfriend' ... He just wouldn't stop, knowing that I have commitment issues that mean it'll be a very long time before I could consider anyone a boyfriend. Then he'll say things that nearly compare himself to the guy I'm seeing ... such as what they look like, how they make me feel (my friend knows he's one of the only guys I'm ever completely myself around). This morning he even said maybe I should spend some more time single, bearing in mind I've been single for two and a half years! After he said that he continued to mess around with me, which resulted in him signing his name on the back of my neck, so 'it could be seen' that he was there ...??? Is this a protection thing for being a friend? Or a jealousy thing? And if it is, does he have a right to be jealous when he goes home to a girlfriend each night??
If this doesn't make much sense, I'm sorry, I'm trying to make sense of it all myself!!
-
QUESTION:
I need help, I went through my boyfriend/fiance's iphone and found some painful surprises...?
Background:
So my fiancee purposed valentines day in Seattle 2010, we have been really good friends for 5 years. He has always had a crush on me but I didn't want any kind of commitment, I wanted to be free. He is an amazing guy but he is wild and loves to impress the ladies because of self worth issues. He has only had 2 major relationships: 1st the girl cheated all the time, couldnt keep her legs closed, had multiple abortions...you get the idea, so he started cheating. 2nd the girl was overbearing and emasculated him, basicaly made him feel like b*tch boy, she would stay at her x boyfriends house but "nothing happened. She was cheating, so in turn he cheated back. This behavior gave him issues with women. I always came to the rescue, offered my encouraging words and a good shoulder to lean on. He became lost in the drinking and partying, broken heart and all, I felt really bad for him. He always has to be center of attention, but it can be funny and entertaining. We really bonded and were very close, personaly and emotionaly, I was the only woman he could trust. But I saw his ways when he got drunk with the girls, very flamboyant, very flirtatious and very loose with his words...party animal and a social butterfly.
After 5 years of friendship he finally got me, we both very indie, love music, traveling, very artistic, we are both extremely emotional and passionate specially twords each-other. We are amazing together, but im haunted by his ways and with very good reason, The first part of our relationship was really rocky and there was a lot of pain, hurt and disrespect. I couldn't deal with how he acted as my boyfriend when we went out, when we were friends that was a completely different story, I could care less. But being his girlfriend it was disrespectful to me and made me look like one of those stupid girls that follows their boyfriends like a lost puppy, it was sooo dumb. But now we are wonderful, we have found our nitch, figured out a way to communicate wonderfully, we don't fight and we respect on another. Things really couldn't be better.
So here is the deal;
I was playing on the apps on his iphone, he was on the computer playing one of his online man games. I got curious and decided to look through his text messages...
1st message I found was from 6 months ago telling a girl he met; "my friend is just mad cause she wants to be with me but I dont want nothing to do with her like that". We were heavily involved, he had begged me to stay with him right before this incident confessing his undying love for me. He denied me, made me look stupid and like a crazy obsessed stalker chick...umm no, not going to fly, I will chew him up and spit him out. When really I was mad cause he ditched me and took off to the bar, I couldn't go I was throwing a party at my house, he just mobbed out.
2nd message I found was to another girl about 4 months ago, the girl asked "is that your girlfriend with you?" he replied "Oh god no, she is just a friend, so what are you doing later?" at that time he was begging me to move out with him.
3rd message was less than 2 months ago right before Christmas of "09", the text read "hey I dont know if you remember who I am but I was wondering if you want to meet up and go for coffee sometime or maybe a beer". The number wasn't saved and apparently it was some random chick he met. At that time we were talking marriage, I found this last night, he purposed on valentines day a week ago.
Being it was his iphone his hot mail was automatically signed in, I found many random conversations with many different women through out our relationship, including pictures from women that read look and it this one I just shaved...you get the idea.
I trusted in him, his love for an old friend, maybe that was my downfall. I had my suspicions, I had to make sure I wasn't being thrown under the bus.
Now I am engaged to a man that is somewhat living a double life, I feel like its disgusting, but I cant tell him, I was the asshole that didn't respect his privacy that he trusted me with.
I need an opinion that isn't bias, if I leave him he couldn't live with it, I don't know if I could but I cant marry someone that is doing this, specially trying to hook up with some random girl less than two months before he knew he was going to ask me to marry him...
What the hell am I going to do, I need some major help, major help.
-
ANSWER:
You will not be happy from here on out. You should walk away now - as hard as it seems, it's the best decision. You will live with this guy always curious about that text, call or email he just received. It can drive you nuts!
Been there and done that. It's a waste of time. It is good that you have stumbled across this now so you can do something before it is too late. Yes, we should not be going through their things, but it is the same way I found out and was able to leave, and I am glad I did. And although it is difficult to do, you deal with it for a few weeks, get over it will be glad later you did it. I contemplated the whole "pity stay" I'm too far into this struggle, but in the end it just was not worth it. I'm with a wonderful person now and it feels good not wondering what is going on in his inbox.
-
QUESTION:
Did you feel pressured to take your husband's name?
A friend of mine is getting married this weekend and is very upset about giving up her name. Myself and others have told her she can keep her name or hyphenate it, but she doesn't want to do that. It's almost like she feels it's just something she has to accept whether she likes it or not. She made a comment about it being a sign of commitment. Well, if commitment is the issue, her husband could just as easily take her name. What are your thoughts on this? Why is it such a big deal for a woman to take her husband's name?
-
QUESTION:
Please help with my essay on baby abandonment?
Any suggestions would be great (;
One major issue that has occured in the United States in the past and is still occurioccurredy is baby abandonment, a/k/a "baby dumping." It may apply any time a child is left without appropriate supervision for extended periods of time. Hearing babies becoming abandoned is heartbreaking. There could be many reasons to the causes of this action. One, the baby was not planned. Therefore, the parents may not have been ready either mentally or financially, and decide to leave the baby. Two, many people are against abortion, which lead to many unwanted babies being born. Three, the woman may have fear of rejection from a boyfriend, friend, or family member if they keep the baby. Some psychiatrists believe that young mothers can become overwhelmed by the presence of something that they were in denial of for nine months, as well as the father not being supportive. The best way to end is by giving women more education about sex and it's outcomes, and to provide planning for those who need it. It has been estimated that there are over 50 babies abandoned daily across the United States, which adds up to over 20,000 babies a year.. many of which do not survive.
One way to solve this issue is by encouraging women who decide to not keep their babies to follow the Safe Haven Act (depending on each state). For example, The Safe Haven Act of Massachusetts of 2004 allows a parent to legally surrender newborn infants 7 days old or younger with no signs of neglect to a designated hospital, police station, or fire station without facing prosecution. The parent will be encouraged to provide information to help in planning the future care of the baby, but is not required. Once the newborn is medically screened, it will be placed in a Department of Social Services foster or adoptive home. The Safe Haven Act of Massachusetts partnered with a few other associations, creating a multimedia campaign informing state residents about the new law. Their toll-free hotline recieves an averaging 50 calls per month.
Another way to solve this issue is following Project Cuddle, founded by Debbe Magnusen and her husband David. The goal of this non-profit organization is to save as many babies' lives as possible, with a strong commitment to help any pregnant girl or woman. They do not charge any money to the girls or their families. It also offers a 24-hour crisis hotline. To date, they have rescured 564 babies from being abandoned. They give women a chance to choose an adoptive family for their baby, making sure they have made a decision they are comforable with allowing them to move on with their lives. About 60% of women call Project Cuddle for assistance in raising their babies.They strongly believe that no baby deserves to die before it has had a chance to live.
Although today there are many ways to solve this issue, many babies who are saved and do grow up into adulthood often continue to wonder about their origins. These "foundlings" may or may not ever find out who their birth parents are, or why they were abandoned. Their past remains a complete mystery, along with a missing part of their identity. This often causes grief to some whose parents' never decide to step up. The best way to solve this issue is by preventing unwanted babies in the first place. One way is by showing women or girls how difficult it is to care for a child, being offered through a "Real Skillz Parenting Course." The woman or teen is given a programmed baby that will cry periodically for various reasons, in which they have to solve in order to make the doll stop crying. Another way is by working with parents to educate their children about sex and all of its consequences. Finally, a third option is abstinence education. Abstaining from sex is the most effective way of preventing not only unwanted births, but also any other diseases that a person may receive from having sex.
In conclusion, baby abandonment is a huge reoccurring issue in the United States. The foremost reason in preventing this issue from happening is to save the lives of babies. Every baby deserves a chance to live. The first and second way help to solve the problem that women face when they do not know what to do with their unwanted baby. However, the third way ends up becoming the best way because it prevents unwanted babies to be born at all. Educating women in pregnancy helps them to make better and wiser decisions, lowering the rate of infant deaths and abandonments each year.
Sorry that it's so long... T__T
-
QUESTION:
Calling all psychologists, counselors, and kind-hearted people: So...want to hear the story of my life?
I need help. I am just confused and at a loss. So if anyone wants to listen and give advice, then here you go!
To start off, I'll let you know that I am a mixed guy half black and half asian. Not a big deal...well not through grade school, but as you get older people start making assumptions about you become stereotypical and believe what they want to believe about other people and I've first hand experienced this type of sad behavior. Anyway, dad was in the military, he hardly was ever home, mom was a stay-at-home mom raising 3 kids, I was the youngest (two older sisters). Still to this day even though my dad is in the same house, I don't think we've ever held a conversation, never taught me how to shave, about cars, women, LIFE. My mom, any little thing wrong we would get whooped or lectured for hours to the point I remember I was truly frightened of her. Then she would cook dinner and pretend nothing ever happened like giving us food was suppose to renew things. I was raised as a naive kid, kept on a tight leash. I was always good in school - gifted program, and honors society. In high school I was in at least 10 clubs and programs including football, math team, business and engineering clubs. But the main reason I did all of these was because I never wanted to be home...my parents fought enough to the point my mind couldn't handle. Have you heard your parents yell, "Your mom's a ****** whore" "You're a stupid ******" "Get out before I call the cops" to eachother while dishes and tvs smashed in the background? I called the police once or twice, once I even took out a baseball bat and told them I would start smashing things if they don't stop. Now don't get me wrong, they really are loving people (unless im in denial? and how would I know what love is anyway) but horrible parents. Out of high school I went to a local private university for engineering all expenses paid, stayed at home thought things would be better, (and well the truth is I went to school to study electrical engineering so I could learn how to build robots that killed people. I wonder where I got an idea like that, how could anyone be so sick?)but the factors in life at the time were just overwhelming to the point I stopped going to classes and focused my attention on keeping my sanity. Well I lost my scholarships, so I had to pay out of pocket for community college. Understand, at this point in time, I pretty much just mentally blocked out my family instead of pretending all the time I was happy.
Well, since I never wanted to be home, I was always out, slowly entering the night scene, meeting people that maybe I never should have. Started smoking, doing drugs, drinking, sex, all that good stuff. Got myself into trouble with the law, jailtime, kicked out the house, etc. The past two years is all a blur to me, now I am back living with them, they are trying to be better, they don't fight as much. The thing is they blame me and other people for whats happened to me. I feel they aren't sympathetic to the fact of what I've been through because of them. And I just can't let it go, I can't drop it because its a whole lifetime of pain and confusion. And now as I'm getting older the world just doesn't seem like a good place anymore, I have trust, commitment, and self-esteem issues (just to name a few). I'm on a rollercoaster of depression, anxiety, stress, short-term memory, I don't talk to anyone anymore, I feel isolating myself is best for now. So add dissociation on top of that. I just can't be happy. I can only find temporary relief by listening to music or going out to a club or something, but now they just tell me not to go out, because they think only BAD people are out at night. Well I'm six months sober now, back in school, moving to a new city, new people, and trying to hang on to the motivation and hope that I've got. All of this I'm paying for with a personal private loan of ,000. No help from parents, they didn't even want to sign a guarantor form which all college students are required for student housing. Let me conclude with the fact that through all this time, never in my life had a gf, reasons being in high school I somehow had the idea I always wanted to be settle with a job, car, my own place etc. so I can treat her good. After hs, as you know things got turned upside down, and the ladies left in this town were pretty much trashy anyway. And I wasn't exactly in the right mentality.
I'm 21 now, the entire past 5 years I worked fulltime, two of the years at a professional jewellers as manager-on-duty while completing my associates. I've been a man of oppressed feelings and emotion, no true friends, and on top of that, through it all, my folks think I'm a scumbag, they look at me funny, like I'm a freak "What went wrong" kinda look. When I'm not home...I'm happy. No one causes problems for me outside of home. I try to stay neutral as far as most everything in life. I have an eclectic personality and get along with mostly everybody, except doctors, they tend to look at me like I'm scum. I guess I don't know how to talk to them? I never identified with any religion but its always been hard for me to believe theres a supreme being, and I don't let anyone get to close to me. I'm just so confused about everything at this point in life and sometimes my head feels like its going to explode. Probably much like yours after reading all of this.
Now this here is just way too long and if anyone took the time to throroughly read it, then I am truly thankful for your time and thoughtfulness. I am open for your thoughts, opinions, and suggestions. Would you suggest seeing a school counselor? Everyone always told me I am going to be something great one day, but I just don't know anymore. Thanks everyone.
I am an accounting undergrad. Its tough, I have no one that supports me, I am nothing like a "typical accounant"
Im stressed because I took out this loan and am depending on finishing my degree when I am already on academic probation, have no more course forgivenesses and everyone claims accounting is one of the hardest majors next to pre-med. I feel I can do it, but who knows, one slip and thats it for me. I have no extra lives left.
and its mainly when im at home that i feel like this. I feel unappreciated, misunderstood, and not good enough when Im home. Hopefully the new setting will encourage me
and I feel because what I've been through, I won't be able to relate to others. Like they'll look at me as if I'm a loser too. *sigh* my entire life is like finding out theres no santa clause over and over again...so depressing... ok sorry im done with the writing
-
ANSWER:
Let's put it this way, your parents can see what you're going through, they're your parents, I don't think they're that blind. However, they would prefer blaming what happened on you instead. Why? because if they took the blame, it would be like admitting they're bad parents who screwed up their kids life, so it seems like they would rather lie to themselves. The thing is, nobody will truely understand you but yourself. You grew up without good & understanding parents, you can live your whole life without them. You're going toward the right path there trying to get that degree on accounting. You say you feel like you can do it, but one slip and thats it for you. That's pretty tough there in your part, because it's like if you get that degree, you can start all over and go on with your life, but if you don't, you're screwed. If it's like a 50/50, don't do it, one mistake and your whole life will be affected. But if you really really feel like you can do it like you said, work very hard and go for it. You're doing this for your own good. You made your mistakes and you learned from it. Forgive yourself, move on. It's a part of life. You have your whole future ahead of you. Get that degree, show everyone who looked down on you what you can do. Anyways, the first thing you said was "I need help." Right now I think you have the ability to help yourself out, just need hopes and motivations. I suggest you should get the degree first then decide to see a counsilor later. As for your parents, there's no point of trying to make them understand you, they know or at least have a clue, they're just lying to themselve, its not worth it. There are still good things/people out there in the world. Don't give up!!!
I wish the best luck to you! Honestly.
-
QUESTION:
Has my boyfriend lost interest in our relationship. Is he looking for something else?
We have been dating for 6 months. It has been a rocky relationship. First, he was emotionally unavailable and commitment shy. Also, he was still talking to his ex wife, and his 20 year old daughter had issues with him seeing a woman. We have overcome these hurdles to an extent. But lately, he has withdrawn and doesn't seem to want to put any energy into our relationship. A few weeks ago, I came across some emails to another woman in which he was telling her he had been chasing a woman for awhile, but she turned out to be a dud. He tells her he misses her. She replies she missed him to and called him "My cowboy". He swears it was just harmless flirting, but there are other signs too. We have had a strong sexually healthy relationship, and he has degressed in this area drastically. Not only does he not make advances or loving touch me very often, but he rejects my advances. We still have sex, but it's not as often or as loving. Admittidly, I do worry and obsess about what he's doing, and I know it's driving him crazy. But he's given me plenty of signs and signals. He does really strange things, like get up in the middle of the night, set his alarm for the middle of the night , and on occasion leaves. The last 2 mornings in a row, when his alarm goes of in the morning, He has reset it for 9:30, when I questioned him about it, he became defensive and told me he was still asleep, It was just a coincidence that it was for 9:30 both times, and I was crazy. On the other hand, we spend alot of time together, he calls everyday, and we're together most nights. He tells me he loves me and I believe he does, but my instincts are telling something's wrong. He spends hours at a time on the computer instead of going to bed. I don't know what he's doing, and he's secretive about his emails. Two of our friends have had dreams that he was with another woman and dumped me. I don't believe that these dreams are neccessarilly true, but I wonder if they see signs that I am trying to ignore and these dreams are a result of that. Confused.
-
ANSWER:
WOW....well all i can tell you is this ,well first of all i need to say i've been there and done that...so that being said..he will ALWAYS talk to his ex they have a daughter together ,and yes they will always have something to say about who he's with..good or bad.anyways,i really think you should just sit down w/him and just talk things out,instead of why are you doing this and doing that ,all that does is make them frustrated .you need answers soo just sit w/him and get those answers .and are you really ready for all this drama?lhope thins work out.
-
QUESTION:
Was I wrong to grow attached to my online friend?
A few months ago I terminated association with a person I had been online friends with for close to 2 years. I have since picked up the pieces of my ego and made my peace with the situation. His behavior put me through an emotional rollercoster for several weeks.
Last summer, in an effort to be more sociable exchanged contact information with this person and since then we would talk almost every night. We did not have a romantic relationship as he claimed he did not get want to get involved in another (after having 3 past failures), and this was ok as I was glad just to have another person to talk to. Both of us had a lot in common and we both considered ourselves to be aromantic, that is people that have a very low to non-existent sex drives. We met in a forum on the subject.
Flash forward a couple of months later and I learned he was seeing/speaking to other women....
Still okay, after all we were just friends, but I started to feel as though I was being strung along on some kind of ego trip. This played on my fears, as I have a history of BAD friendships. I recalled our relationship before and after we started chatting online. I came to the realization that if we weren't discussing things of a sexual nature he showed little interest in me. I confronted him about this, he sort of laughed it off and told me that he thought very highly of me, that I had helped cheer him up during his darker moments (he also subtly implied that he thought I was attractive as well)....all of which failed to sequester my fears that I was being used as his personal "pick-me-up" and the confidant I thought I had gained was truly just a pretense.
One of the women he was speaking to was due to meet him in person. Though he claimed he was not romantically interested in her anymore because of her overt sexuality.When the time arrived in which the friend came to visit, I spoke with him on the matter. By his own concession he did not have feelings for her and was concerned about any sexual advances she would make. He asked me to sign online at night during the duration of her stay.
.....
Three days passed without a word from him. All the while I waited for him patiently, worried that something disastrous had happened.
Then suddenly one evening he IM'ed me. He told me only that this woman was VERY beautiful (he made a great deal in describing her beauty) and that he enjoyed her stay thus far. Almost immediately he left me but not before asking me to sign on again the next night.
I did not.
Much to my surprise, the following day I read on his personal blog that he had sexual relations with her. =/
....I could not describe how utterly foolish I felt. To know that while I waited for him for three days, he was busy having his cock sucked by a stranger. A woman he said he found annoying, but obviously liked enough to engage in sexual relations with. WHICH is further upsetting because of his views on sexuality. He'd completely abandoned his self-stated beliefs for a pretty face!
I told myself before hand that I would not care if he did fool around with her, as it was none of my business, but the quickness with which this transpired, coupled with my existing insecurities.....made me question my own convictions. I lost faith in him. I grew upset thinking of past neglect, feeling so very naive and easily replaced. Easily led and quickly disregarded.
After a couple of days I decided I could no longer allow myself to make the same mistakes. I wrote him the following:
"I am sorry to have to say this, but I do not think I can continue to communicate with you anymore.
To be honest, I should have done this sooner but since it is a new year I need to make an earnest commitment to my resolutions. One of which was to work on boundary issues. I have a problem setting boundaries for myself which make me feel as though I let people walk on me, not that you did, but in essence I involved a total stranger into my drama. And for what sake? I said things I had no business saying, yes it was fun, but I have to set limits for myself. It's a matter of self-respect.
I don't want you to feel as though I'm placing any blame. Clearly, you are a victim.
In retrospect, if we weren't talking about something involving sex, we had nothing to talk about. Even before I sent you that first IM, we didn't comment much on each others entries. It was all rather shallow, and you gave no indication that you wished to speak. I don't know why I did it, perhaps because I wanted to get to know another Asexual; or perhaps because last year I wasn't thinking in depth. I did many impulsive things last year, much to my chagrin. I'm just ashamed to have involved some innocent bystander. For that I feel very, very foolish.
That's all I have to say. I wish you all the best. You are a kind person."
He responded by telling me simply that he did not feel the same way in regards to the s
the situation, but that he respected my feelings. About a week went by without communication, but I could not help but be concerned for his welfare. Within the 2 years that were acquainted I glimpsed into his void. Enough that I worried he'd end his life someday, and as someone that had been in that position before felt obliged to show him remorse. We both led pretty stressful lives and I cared to much to simply stop talking to him.
I decided to contact him again and make amends. Things returned to normal, until one day during a conversation I asked him the following question:
"Why do you like this girl?"
He said simply "well...she's pretty and she seems devoted".
it was then that I asked the question I had long wanted to ask, but knew I would soon regret. I said "I'd like to know what it is you seem to think I lack..."
This took him completely be surprise as he said he didn't think there was a possibility of a romantic relationship as I was (and still consider myself) aromantic. I argued that I had long told him I was trying my hand in dating, in fact I was even seeing this person at the moment. I am an adult now and am more open to the idea of having a romantic relationship with someone. It was he that would continuously talk about how he didn't want to involve himself with another person. Something he seemed to have quickly dismissed.
We came to a consensus, we would just remain friends and we wouldn't let this newfound revelation interfere with that.
But it was easier said then done, a few days after I told him that I needed to have serious conversation on the matter, that I couldn't just sweep it all under the rug. I needed him to voice his thoughts....
instead he excused himself with a "brb", and I thought he'd do jut that be-right -back...
HE LEFT FOR TWO HOURS TO GO PLAY PS3...
What kind of sensible individual does that? Disappears for two hours while I am in the middle of a conversation with you. Suffice to say I was ******* LIVID.
And yet again, I swallowed my anger. Even joked about the matter. We continued to carry on our conversations, but I was still very resentful towards him in the way he handled the situation. I told him I didn't think I could continue to carry on in the same manner. I told him I thought it was wiser if we just remained friends via FB etc.. and discontinue instant messaging services.
The following day he sent me this message:
"Hey, listen:
I feel like we've reached the point on our e-friendship where I feel i should re-analyze the situation.
Here's where you seem to be: you seem to be attached to a person whom you've never met and, now that all of this happened, never will. Here, on the other hand, is where I stand: I completely and utterly lack any interest in your psychosis and affection. When I told you that I have someone, I meant just that.
I don't need anyone else. Thanks for playing.
So here's what we're going to do: I, since I lost all interest in talking to you, am going to stop; and you will need to put on your big girl pants, face that fact and leave me well alone. We're done here. It's been nice meeting you, not so nice knowing you, and marvelous ending this friendship. I wish you nothing. Have a life."
The day after that, I received a message from a random stranger. Someone I had never spoken too, presumably a friend of his.
"Girl, you are insane. You are stark. Raving. Mad. Your pure unadulterated level of BATSHIT has been leaking like a goddamn sieve for months now. I mean, sweet motherfuck. Yeah we don't know each other, but craziness is always lol, and I like lols.
My thing mostly is, do you actively try to maintain this level of, as my grandmother would say, "nutty as a fruitcake"? Or does it come naturally? Either way it's impressive. Like you sold your neurons to the devil or something. Your crazy *** came straight out the pits of hell. ****.
Anyway, have a fun time methodically alienating everyone with whom you could possibly form any sort of meaningful interpersonal connection!
"
My response:
"Uhh thanks for your insight?
You've obviously been told a skewed perspective on the situation. I don't know what you've been told. But there are always 2 sides to a story. I don't believe I've done anything "crazy" and neither do any of my friends on this side playing field.
What I do think is absurd is the fact that he would have a total stranger message me like this. What kind of person does that? If it's over it's over. There's no need to have strangers insult me because you are too afraid to stand up for your own actions.
Thanks for your.....advice?
Now why don't you do the same for your "friend". Instead of criticizing and judging someone you don't know."
I received word from a friend that he had posted something alarming on his FB page. I went to see what it was and lo and behold it read:
"You are a ******* ugly *****. I want to stab you repeatedly and play in your blood."
I involved myself in something I knew could cause me future grief, therefore I cannot call anyone names BUT there isn't a curse word in the English language that would suffice to describe his behavior.
A part of me feels as though I shouldn't have said anything at all. I shouldn't have continued to ask him to sit down and have that conversation. That if I had just kept my mouth shut, things would have eventually worked themselves out. But I realize that if he's capable of wishing death upon me, lord knows what he's actually capable of doing.
I don't mourn him as a person, I mourned the loss of a friend I thought I had. I blamed myself for growing attached and believed him when he said I was crazy. The reason why I am posting is because there's still a part of me that wonders if I deserved it. What lessons can I learn from this?
-
ANSWER:
This has got to be one of the more interesting things I've ever read.
Well, what can I say? Guys only know one adjective to describe ex's, or all woman in general: crazy. Don't take it personally, they're vocabulary just isn't that advanced.
Guess he turned out to be like 97% of the male population. Sorry. I have known people on the internet and become friends with them and I can tell you that he's a piece of shit. Some people are just like that.
You know the funny part is this sounds all too familiar. Meeting the guy on the internet, him meeting another girl, feeling jealousy when INSIDE you tell yourself it shouldn't matter he can do whatever he wants. But your a human. And you feel and even if it's insensible and wrong it happens.
Yes, oh yes. I know this very well.
And the solution? Looks like you got that covered. Don't talk to him, ever. Ever. Again.
You didn't have a friend, so don't waste your time mourning. You loved what your imagination put together and he was just the canvas for that.
And don't even THINK you deserve it. No one deserves to feel less than.
What lesson can you learn?
That you can survive this and come out a better person.
Goodluck
-
QUESTION:
Isn't it time that we accept all Americans regardless of their sexual orientation?
Obama pledges 'unwavering'
support to gay causes, community
Posted on Oct 12, 2009 | by Michael Foust
WASHINGTON (BP)--Using some of his strongest language to date in siding with the homosexual community, President Obama told a gathering of the Human Rights Campaign Saturday that his commitment to their cause was "unwavering" and that his administration, before he leaves office, would end the military's Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy.
"I'm here with a simple message: I'm here with you in that fight" for homosexual causes, Obama, the keynote speaker, told those gathered at an event held by the nation's largest homosexual activist organization. "For even as we face extraordinary challenges as a nation, we cannot -- and we will not -- put aside issues of basic equality."
Unlike a speech delivered to homosexual leaders in June, Obama in his Oct. 10 address put no qualifiers on his pledge to end Don't Ask, Don't Tell. He did, though, repeat language in that June speech criticizing what he called "outworn arguments and old attitudes" about homosexuality -- language that was viewed by evangelicals then and now as condemning orthodox interpretations of Scripture.
Additionally, Obama repeated his stance for overturning the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act -- which, if reversed, could force every state to recognize "gay marriages" from other states. He also stated his opposition to those who would "enshrine discrimination into our constitution" -- a reference to a federal marriage amendment and presumably also state marriage amendments.
He made news by saying he would sign -- if it makes it to his desk -- a defense authorization bill that includes an amendment broadening the hate crimes law to include homosexual persons. There was some question as to whether he would sign it because it contains funding for a fighter plane engine he opposes. Conservatives say the hate crimes protections put religious liberties at risk.
"My expectation is that when you look back on these years, you will see a time in which we put a stop to discrimination against gays and lesbians -- whether in the office or on the battlefield," Obama said. "You will see a time in which we as a nation finally recognize relationships between two men or two women as just as real and admirable as relationships between a man and a woman. You will see a nation that's valuing and cherishing these families as we build a more perfect union -- a union in which gay Americans are an important part. I am committed to these goals. And my administration will continue fighting to achieve them."
Obama spoke to the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) on the eve of a National Equality March in Washington that focused on homosexual issues. He thanked HRC for "the work you do every day in pursuit of equality" for those "who are gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender."
"Despite the real gains that we've made, there's still laws to change and there's still hearts to open," he said. "There are still fellow citizens, perhaps neighbors, even loved ones -- good and decent people -- who hold fast to outworn arguments and old attitudes, who fail to see your families like their families, who would deny you the rights most Americans take for granted. And that's painful and it's heartbreaking. And yet you continue, leading by the force of the arguments you make, and by the power of the example that you set in your own lives -- as parents and friends, as PTA members and church members, as advocates and leaders in your communities. And you're making a difference."
Bob Stith, the Southern Baptist national strategist for gender issues and representative of the denomination's Task Force on Ministry to Homosexuals (SBCTheWayOut.com), once again expressed frustration at how Obama characterized Christian conservatives. He also said Obama marginalized ex-gays.
"President Obama continues to portray all who disagree with him as those who 'hold fast to outworn arguments and old attitudes,'" Stith told Baptist Press. "The inference is that if an attitude is old it must be wrong. The constitution is an old document. The Bible is older still. ... It is adherence to those timeless teachings of Scripture that has made it possible for thousands of men and women to find freedom from a struggle for which they did not ask and one from which they desperately sought freedom. If our president truly wants to end discrimination, he will be equally passionate about the discrimination these heroic people face. He will care about their stories and fight for the right for their stories to be heard. Until he does, his passion and eloquence will ring hollow."
Obama said he and his wife Michelle sent "a message" when they "invited LGBT families to the White House to participate in events like the Easter Egg Roll." Obama's speech came one day after John Berry, a homosexual who is director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management said the time is ripe to pass legislation favored by the
The gay community must also take some responsibility and be respectful
The gay community must also take some responsibility and be respectful
I would like to see the gay community enlisted in the Medical Corps of the armed services. I see them as ideally suited for such a service.
The gay community also have a service to give if they are so disposed in the ministry of the lord.
-
QUESTION:
Is it possible to forgive and move on?
Sorry this is so long...complicated situation!
My b/f and I have been dating for 10 months. I have major trust issues from a past relationship, and in March, I went through his phone and saw that he lied about going out to a bar with a co-worker (his boss' boss) one Saturday night. He claimed he was going to tell me in the morning, he was mad, and we broke up. I immediately went to therapy because I never thought I'd be that girl who went through her b/f's phone, and we got back together a day or so later.
Things were going much better, then a month later, he broke up with me completely out of the blue. He kept saying it was better for me, I deserved better, etc., then it finally came out that he had lied about something in his past (something he had told me he did in the military that he didn't.) HE immediately went into therapy (which he had always been very opposed to since he has a Psych degree), I forgave him because I know he has a lot of issues about feeling like a failure, low self-esteem, etc., and he was elated that I forgave him and took him back.
Again, things were going very well and a month later (last week), he broke up with me again. This time, I found out that he had hung out with a 23-yr-old female friend (we're both in our 30s) Friday afternoon while I was home (they went over to his friend's house and had a beer), AND he invited another 23-year-old co-worker out with he and his friend that Sunday night, without asking me, and lied about who was there. A friend of mine walked down the street and saw them though, so he had to fess up.
We were broken up for a week and he called me Friday night, freaking out that he doesn't know what he's doing, I was scared, I went over, and we had a long discussion that he's afraid of commitment and no one's ever stood by him and everyone he's ever loved has left him, so he gets scared and runs away (his mom passed away 3 years ago, and his relationship with his son's mom was horrible and ended after 2 years.) He said that things were going really well, I was practically living there (which he wanted), then we went to a wedding, it all came to a head and he freaked out. He said he knows he wants to spend the rest of his life with me, that I'm the best thing that ever happened to him, and he doesn't want to lose me. He said he knows it's messed up, but it was almost like he had to "test" me by breaking up with me all those times to see if I'd come back since no one has ever stood by him (he was in a severe car accident and had 2 surgeries 10 or so years ago and none of his friends stuck around.)
He had therapy last night and his therapist said that it sounds like he found a good woman, he's just afraid to take it all the way because he's afraid of what bad things might happen. His friends/brothers have been telling me some things about how he's very flirtatious when he goes out, how he and the first above-mentioned 23-year-old girl have been booty call buddies for years (he swears they never slept together...he had told me they had only been friends, but with all this, he admitted that they did make out once and admitted that he did take her over to his friend's house the other day, which he admits was wrong), but part of me wonders if he's just putting on an act to be cool in front of his friends/brothers because of the self-esteem issues. None of his friends or family know that he's in therapy, he's been taught that opening up, crying, therapy, etc. are all signs of weakness...so I'm wondering if that's what's going on.
I don't want to make excuses for him, and I don't want to be the idiot naive girl, and I definitely don't want this to happen another month down the road. I also don't want to walk away from a good guy who just has a lot of issues from his past that he needs to work out, especially when he IS making the effort by going to therapy.
Any thoughts?
To answer Deuce, I know for a fact that he goes to therapy because I have seen the receipts and the "homework" the dr. gives him.
What I don't get is, if he wanted to be with these other girls, why not just be with them when he had the chance....why keep me around?
Also, I don't think he's going elsewhere for the sex...if anything, I have the higher sex drive of the two of us...
-
QUESTION:
Would you sign a petition of 'no confidence' for any politician supporting nuclear power?
I'm having a hard time seeing any difference between Democrats and Republicans on this issue, even after the Japanese melt down. The so-called 'liberal' by the name of Mr. Barack Obama held a press conference on the day of the earthquake explaining that nuclear power is a "clean energy source." He went on to call for increased use of nuclear power. (March 11, 2011)
There is no sign that he is backing off this policy commitment. Why should economically less advantaged people be put in harms way. This applies to a potential human species killing path with nuclear radioactive planet and depleted uranium weapons radiation subjected to our young and brave men and women in the military service.
I have no confidence in the major parties despite the expected billion dollar plus ad campaign for president next year.
-
ANSWER:
1. Pro-nuke and pro-war does NOT = "liberal".
2. Given that nuclear waste remains lethally radioactive for THOUSANDS of years, yet the best containers our current technology can provide begin to deteriorate after a few HUNDRED years, nuclear power is NOT a "safe" or "clean" energy source.
-
QUESTION:
Why are men who don't want to marry still seen as immature in today's society?
I’ve heard a lot of people in general say that men who don’t want to marry are immature and cowardly. Could someone please explain to me why this view is still widely held? I am having a difficult time seeing how that view is immature. Marriage is a very complicated legal contract with a myriad of legal issues associated with it. It’s no secret that the divorce rate is high, lawyers exploit splitting couples financially, and the contract gives the woman a legal advantage in several key areas. Why is it cowardly to avoid a legal contract that is harmful? Honestly, I think it’s a very intelligent thing to do (just as it’s intelligent to not jump out of a building to show how manly you are). In what way is it cowardly to tell a woman that you don’t want to get married? It takes balls to tell a woman “Look, I love you and I appreciate your presence in my life, but I’m not going to put my head on railroad tracks for you by signing an unfair and archaic legal commitment. I would be more than happy to live with you in a de facto relationship for as long as our love last.”
Could someone please enlighten me as to why so many people still hold those notions? I’ll give 10 points to the best answer.
I'm not in a relationship right now. I didn't tell any woman that. But when I do get into one, that will be my response.
What legal contract would be an acceptable substitute? No legal contract at all is my answer. Two people should be together on the basis of love alone and nothing more. Guys are iffy about marriage because they want to keep what they work for.
-
QUESTION:
How many more lobbyists does Obama need?
The White House Tuesday evening disclosed that almost three weeks ago the Obama administration granted ethics wavers for two additional officials who had previously worked as lobbyists. On February 20 the administration signed waivers for Jocelyn Frye, former general counsel at the National Partnership for Women & Families, and Cecilia Muñoz, the former senior vice president for the National Council of La Raza, allowing them to work on issues for which they lobbied.
These two are in addition to deputy Defense Secretary Bill Lynn, a former Raytheon lobbyist whose waiver was granted two days after President Obama announced on January 21 what he heralded as the most sweeping ethics rules in American history -- ones that would "close the revolving door that lets lobbyists come into government freely."
The Executive Order on Ethics Commitments by Executive Branch Personnel requires that lobbyists who become members of Obama administration will not be able to work on matters they lobbied on for two years, or in the agencies they lobbied during the previous two years. Out of approximately 800 executive branch appointments, three waivers have been granted, the Obama administration said.
Not all of the former lobbyists entering the administration have required the formal waivers; the White House has also required incoming administration officials who worked as lobbyists to write letters of recusal, indicating issues that they will stay away from dealing with because of their previous jobs. But those letters of recusal have not yet been disclosed.
Frye's waiver, signed by Norm Eisen, the special counsel to the President and designate agency ethics official, states that it's "in the public interest to grant the waiver because Ms. Fry's expertise in the areas in which she acted as a registered lobbyist is essential to her service to the Office of the First Lady." Frye, director of policy and projects in the Office of the First Lady, has "a particular focus on women, families and on engagement with the greater D.C. community," the White House says. Having directed the National Partnership’s Workplace Fairness Program in her previous job, she focused on "employment and gender discrimination issues, with a particular emphasis on employment barriers facing women of color and low-income women."
Muñoz's waiver was granted also in the public interest "because Ms. Munoz's knowledge and expertise are vital to the functioning of the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs," Eisen wrote. As director of intergovernmental affairs in the Executive Office of the President, Muñoz is chief liaison to the Latino community, in addition to coordinating with state and local governments. signed by Norm Eisen, the special counsel to the President and designate agency ethics official, states that it's "in the public interest to grant the waiver because Ms. Fry's expertise in the areas in which she acted as a registered lobbyist is essential to her service to the Office of the First Lady."
"We took the rare step of granting the waivers to Ms. Frye and Ms. Muñoz because of the importance of their respective positions and because of each woman’s unequalled qualifications for her job," Eisen said. "Each is a leading substantive expert on the relevant issue areas and each also has long-standing relationships with constituencies important to their respective offices."
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/03/obama-white-hou.html
"Cecilia Muñoz, the former senior vice president for the National Council of La Raza"
From Michelle Malkin's blog, May 6, 2008:
10. La Raza supports driver’s licenses for illegal aliens.
9. La Raza supports in-state tuition discounts for illegal alien students that are not available to law-abiding US citizens and law-abiding legal immigrants.
8. La Raza opposes cooperative immigration enforcement efforts between local, state, and federal authorities.
7. La Raza sponsors militant ethnic nationalist charter schools subsidized by your public tax dollars, including the “Aztlan Academy” in Tucson, AZ, the Mexicayotl Academy in Nogales, AZ, and Academia Cesar Chavez Charter School in St. Paul, Minn.
6. La Raza gives mainstream cover to a poisonous subset of ideological satellites, led by Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan, or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan (MEChA), which the late GOP Rep. Charlie Norwood rightly characterized as “a radical racist group…[and] one of the most anti-American groups in the country, which has permeated U.S. campuses since the 1960s, and continues its push to carve a racist nation out of the American West.”
5. La Raza opposes a secure fence on the southern border.
4. Former La Raza president Raul Yzaguirre, Hillary Clinton’s Hispanic outreach advisor said this:
“US English is to Hispanics as the Ku Klux Klan is to blacks.” He was referring to US English the nation’s oldest, largest citizens’ action group dedicated to preserving the
4. Former La Raza president Raul Yzaguirre, Hillary Clinton’s Hispanic outreach advisor said this:
“US English is to Hispanics as the Ku Klux Klan is to blacks.” He was referring to US English the nation’s oldest, largest citizens’ action group dedicated to preserving the unifying role of the English language in the United States.
La Raza also pioneered Orwellian open-borders Newspeak and advised the Mexican government on how to lobby for illegal alien amnesty while avoiding the terms “illegal” and “amnesty.”
3. La Raza is currently leading a smear campaign against staunch immigration enforcement leaders and has called for TV and cable TV networks to keep immigration enforcement proponents off the airwaves–in addition to pushing for Fairness Doctrine policies to shut up their foes.
2. La Raza has consistently opposed post-9/11 national security measures at every turn.
1. The National Council of La Raza means The National Council of “The Race,” for God’s sake.
Their signature slogan, chanted at pro-illegal alien rallies from coast to coast, is “La raza unida nunca sera vencida.”
“A united [Hispanic] race will never be defeated.”
Still waiting for liberals to condemn Obama for this action. Whats more, still waiting on them to do something about it.
***drumming fingers***
***crickets***
-
QUESTION:
Can my husband really use me for his 6 yr prison term & abandon & cheat on me upon release w/o any consequence?
I know everyone is going to say I should be o.k. letting a man go who doesn't want to be with me, and I agree I have to and will be able to accept it at some point. But this has been the only man I've had the kind of connection with in my entire adult life that I wanted more of. No other man could compare for me, not exactly to my husband, like I think he's just so cool, but the connection we had, I haven't experienced w/any other man, or person. I started having my first psychic dreams about him& our spiritual connection has gone both ways for over 15 years. he's always had this connection w/another girl, but she didn't prove to be as loyal in his life as I was. I believed this man who spoke of honor and loyalty as if he lived by those values. He was always honest about this other woman. He told me of their continued friendship and committed his love and trust for a relationship was stronger with me. We had our differences and issues dealing w/a prison relationship, getting married 6 years toward the end of a 14 year sentence. All 14 years I wouldn't send money to deter him from trying to use me for money, but it was a costly relationship just to communicate and visit. I was always encouraged to live a fulfilling life, he did not wish for me to lack experiences due to his incarceration. My life was never fulfilling w/o him. In trying to experience a relationship w/available men, I was only disappointed & eager for my husband to come home so I could finally have the complete family I craved w/the right people. My commitment to him was in my refusal to settle. The year before he got out, I asked if he was coming home, he said yes, then after a difference of opinion he changed his mind. I didn't hear from him, then, around his expected release time, I was having many dreams about him& asked if his friends had heard from him. He called me and said he got out and he doesn't think its a good idea for us to spend time together. I didn't understand. Finally we met up so I could give him his stuff back. He was very distant, so I gave him his space to adjust to being out after so long. After a few months of not communicating, he told me he wants to work out his relationship w/his ex-girlfriend from before he went to prison, that other woman, and he does not want to work out any relationship w/me, doesn't even want to be friends. He was immediately loyal to her. I told him as always, I believed we had a destiny and I wanted to find out what it was, so I'd be here when he's ready. A year later, I'm having constant dreams of us hanging out, being friends, so I called him. He said he really is in love w/this other woman, and only wants to divorce me. After all I invested in our relationship, and all the support I gave him, and we both sign on a marriage, can he really just pull out of that legal commitment w/o even putting anything into it? I'm in California so it doesn't matter that he never even consummated our marriage out side of prison, or lived with me, or cheated on me w/the only one person I asked him not to. Can I sue him for fraud, for signing a contract he never believed in or committed to even though the contract is a commitment? Other than my heart being broken so bad it will take years to recover, and I have missed many days of work, and having to see a dr. for clinical depression, I'm pissed he let me, thru the ages of 17-33 and being a single mom(w/a different father of the child) spend all that time and money following him 4-8 hours across the state for visits, being totally truly in love with and committed to him, when he had to have known all along he was truly in love w/this other woman. He had to have no intentions of making good on his promises to always be a friend to me and always being available to help me and my son when we need it, as soon as he's available to help. He said he'd be helping me w/rent when he gets out, and blah blah blah, all the promises we'd want a man to make. When I was insecure about this other woman seemingly to never really get out of his life, he assured me he knew how wrong and messed up it would be of him to get out and leave me for her, he'd never do that no matter what happened between us, he said he would never hurt and disrespect me in that way. Exactly my worst fear came true. He didn't even give us one chance when he got out, went straight back to her. I was able to communicate better w/him while he was in prison. I don't see how this isn't just another crime of his, hurting another person, this time mentally and emotionally, not physically. I knew he had it in him to fight men over whatever, but I thought it was due to his honor and just being too naive to know how to be honorable in those situations w/o fighting. I honestly saw and believed he was an honest person if nothing else and that's what mattered to me. I can't believe th
-
QUESTION:
Next taxpayer bailout: Abortion industry,What do you think about Obama's bailout for the Abortion industry?
Will Barack Obama provide the abortion industry with a bailout of its own, costing taxpayers billions of dollars?
The Obama-Biden Transition Project posted a plan on its website called "Advancing Reproductive Rights and Health in a New Administration."
" It is signed by a coalition of 66 groups including Planned Parenthood, NARAL Pro-Choice America, the National Organization for Women and the American Civil Liberties Union.
The outline lists proposed steps for Obama's first 100 days in office including the following:
* Increase funding for Title X (which funds Planned Parenthood) to 0 million from the current 0 million
* Expand coverage of taxpayer-funded abortions under Medicaid
* Promote sex education in schools and communities at cost of million
* Provide birth control at colleges
* Expand taxpayer-funded abortions to federal employees, military facilities, the Peace Corps and federal prisoners
* Increase funding for Title V Maternal and Child Health services to 0 million from 6 million
* Provide international abortion providers with billion
* Increase funding for the CDC's school HIV and STD prevention programs from .2 million to .6 million
* Increase funding for substance abuse and mental health services programs for pregnant women and mothers from million to million
* De-fund abstinence only programs
* Re-examine Bush administration policies that block or limit women's access to emergency contraception
* Pass the Freedom of Choice Act
* Select judicial nominees who "demonstrate a commitment to justice civil rights, equal rights, individual liberties, and the fundamental constitutional right to privacy, including the right to have an abortion."
Obama's transition office is also trying to find ways to undo Bush administration policies dealing with abortion.
President Bush issued a regulation today allowing health care workers to refuse to provide abortions if doing so conflicts with their personal, moral or religious beliefs – but the Obama transition team is already seeking a way to repeal the measure.
The rule is scheduled to take effect just three days before Inauguration Day, Jan 20.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/?pageId=83958
-
QUESTION:
Next taxpayer bailout: Abortion industry,What do you think about Obama's bailout for the Abortion industry?
Will Barack Obama provide the abortion industry with a bailout of its own, costing taxpayers billions of dollars?
The Obama-Biden Transition Project posted a plan on its website called "Advancing Reproductive Rights and Health in a New Administration."
" It is signed by a coalition of 66 groups including Planned Parenthood, NARAL Pro-Choice America, the National Organization for Women and the American Civil Liberties Union.
The outline lists proposed steps for Obama's first 100 days in office including the following:
* Increase funding for Title X (which funds Planned Parenthood) to 0 million from the current 0 million
* Expand coverage of taxpayer-funded abortions under Medicaid
* Promote sex education in schools and communities at cost of million
* Provide birth control at colleges
* Expand taxpayer-funded abortions to federal employees, military facilities, the Peace Corps and federal prisoners
* Increase funding for Title V Maternal and Child Health services to 0 million from 6 million
* Provide international abortion providers with billion
* Increase funding for the CDC's school HIV and STD prevention programs from .2 million to .6 million
* Increase funding for substance abuse and mental health services programs for pregnant women and mothers from million to million
* De-fund abstinence only programs
* Re-examine Bush administration policies that block or limit women's access to emergency contraception
* Pass the Freedom of Choice Act
* Select judicial nominees who "demonstrate a commitment to justice civil rights, equal rights, individual liberties, and the fundamental constitutional right to privacy, including the right to have an abortion."
Obama is also trying to find ways to undo Bush administration policies dealing with abortion.
President Bush issued a regulation allowing health care workers to refuse to provide abortions if doing so conflicts with their personal, moral or religious beliefs – but the Obama is already seeking a way to repeal the measure.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/?pageId=83958
I think Obama is a very sick man.
-
ANSWER:
Planned parenthood offers discounted for low income people in their city with the exception of abortion (you must pay full price) So a month of my tax payer dollars to go to help prevent a pregnancy which may cost me alot more of the tax payer money I say GO FOR IT
To stop teaching abstinence and start teacher sex ed I am all for it. It has been proven that abstinence does not work. Teaching safe sex does work. However I feel it should be a parents responsibility but Obama bridging that gap is great because not all parents are comfortable talking to their children about it.
Fed and military personnel if their insurance (which they pay for) covers abortion is a great thing. The procedure being a minor surgery would apply to their deductible therefore not our tax payer money!
Technically the morning after pill is categorized as a contraceptive there for there should not be a restriction. The restriction should be to each individual the insert clearly states no more than 2 should be taken in a 12 month period
I personally do not think anyone should have the right to refuse performing a procedure OR dispensing medication due to religious belief. When you apply to work at a planned parenthood it is known what they do. When they choose to be a pharmacist they know what it may mean dispensing the abortion pill, morning after pill and contraceptives. If they have an issue with it they should apply for a position in a catholic organization or choose a different profession
-
QUESTION:
Does renewing wedding vows strengthen a rocky marriage?
Well since my main profile was suspended for a violation (waiting to get reinstated cause it was first one for obscenity) I figured i'd blow some points on this one asking a question here. My marriage has been on and off rough really most of the 14 years its gone on so far. We were this close to divorce as of last august right at our anniversary. Things have improved, we've been going to counseling, worked thru some of the sexual issues on our own (actually last few weeks have been some of our best sex including premarital) and things seem headed the right way. We're going to vacation with the 3 kids (13f, 5f,1m all birthdays in late april/may) in hawaii, and i'm thinking about renewing our vows in the park thats by diamond head. Specifically this set of vows/service
Welina Me Ke Aloha.
We gather here together on the majestic slopes of Waikiki to celebrate the joyful union of this man,______ and this woman,______ in matrimony on this date of ______here on the island of Oahu, Hawaii.
Mahalo ia oe no ke aloha.
We thank you for the beauty of this day, for the miracle of love, and for this exact moment. We are thankful for all the blessings given to ______and______for bringing their two hearts together as one with Love.
Love is a moving sea between the shores of your souls. Love is a mountain Awash in lovely flowers. It is your home, Where all bright things shine. You feel it now, so strong and free, So part of every breath. That it must live beyond eternity. Love never ends. Oke aloha ka mea oi ae.
Today, you are here to begin the weave of your marriage with the golden threads of love, hope and commitment. You are promising to share the happy and the sad, the joys and the sorrows, the riches and the hardships. The commitment is to one another, to be partners in life helping the other be stronger, wiser and the best friend.
He palena ole ke aloha.
______and ______are you now ready to commit to one another?
Do you take______ to be your wedded wife, To love, honor, and cherish her in all of your days?
Do you take______ to be your wedded husband, To love, honor, and cherish him in all of your days?
Throughout the world, rings are a sign of eternity, for as circles they have no beginning or ending. These rings are the symbol of your pure love and promises which you share together as husband and wife.
(Repeat and place the ring) Me ke aloha pumehana. With all my love, and for all the world to see, I have chosen you as my husband/wife. It is my heart's desire to be with you throughout my life, and I shall love you always.
"YOUR OWN WORDS TO EACH OTHERS"
(poems, tributes, songs, gifts or any words from your heart)
You were born to be together, and together you shall be forevermore. You shall be together even in your silent memory. Memory is once more alive for the love of you. The secrets within me are seen through your love. May you create a home that surrounds your family and friends with Warmth, laughter and love and may your love be eternal.
I ola mau oe me ka mauli ola. He ola lo'ihi a ola kino maika'i, a e pomaikai mau 'ia'oe, i pomaikai ia na kanaka e a'e i kou ola a pau.
It is our wish that your pure love will never be dimmed by the demands of the world. May you always believe in the vows you have made here today throughout your lives. May you have long life and good health, and may you be greatly blessed so that you may be a blessing to many others.
Now in the witness of the state of Hawaii, who performs all true marriages. It is my honor that I pronounce you, partners in life, soul mates, Husband and Wife. You may kiss your bride and you may kiss your groom.
So what do you think? A piece of why I want to do it with the kids there is that the 13 year old has definitely caught us fighting (not physically, just scream/yell/curse) a number of times, and maybe the 5 year old has too. So I was thinking this would be a nice happy warm feely thing for us all. Our anniversary is in August, but we met in April 95. Dated in May, moved in together in June, proposed in July, married in August, pregnant in September
Just to clarify a little, I'm not expecting this to fix anything. We've made good progress both with using counseling, as well as on our own as a part of what counseling is valuable for is giving you the toolbox to deal with the relationship.
In a way I guess I'm sort of looking at it as maybe a fresh start, try and forget the sleeping on the couch on my 14th anniversary, some of the horrible things we've said to each other, etc.
-
ANSWER:
Eric, if it's just not there to begin with, I don't feel redoing your vowels will help things anyway. Love pure love is the name of the game, the name of it all. Without love you don't have much. IF by some chance the two of you feel it WILL be of help, then by all means do whatever you feel will help it along. We're all different, what works for some doesn't for others & visa verse. But before you make up your mind for good, talk it over with your wife & see how she feels about it. It just may be the thing for YOU, no one can truly ans. that but you two...the best to you...:)
-
QUESTION:
When is boxing going to wise up? It's time for boxing to end the PPV madness and get back on ABC, CBS, and NBC
Elite XC deal could change MMA with CBS deal
http://sports.yahoo.com/mma/news;_ylt=AtQ5dZy4DvAsuBPeFbrEs7Q9Eo14?slug=dm-elitecbs022808&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
The entire landscape of mixed martial arts changed today. Maybe.
The announcement that CBS will broadcast live Elite XC shows on Saturday nights in prime time is potentially the biggest deal in the history of the sport in North America.
But no matter what is said about a multi-year commitment and four shows per year, when it comes to television, like everything, it will live and die by the ratings.
“The sport of MMA airing on CBS is the single biggest thing to happen to the sport,” saidElite XC promoter Gary Shaw. That sounds like a promoter over hyping his latest announcement, but if the show is successful, that’s exactly what it will be.
But it’s going to take a huge promotional effort by the network and the company to build the event and make it fly.
Even the most-watched Ultimate Fighting Championship event in history, the Sept. 8 show headlined by Quinton Jackson vs. Dan Henderson in a UFC-Pride light heavyweight championship unification match, drew 4.7 million viewers. While those are great numbers for cable television, they don’t come close to what would be a desirable audience number for CBS, even on a Saturday night.
Within the Male 18-34 age group, the big show UFC numbers would be successful on a network level, but MMA at this point has proven to have a narrow reach. It doesn’t do well with older people. It doesn’t do badly with women within the 18-34 group, but for network prime time success, you need to draw strongly in more than one age group.
Boxing’s much-lauded “Contender” series failed on the network level. World Wrestling Entertainment programming, far more popular on cable television than MMA, was successful on NBC in the 80s, but drew poor numbers the past two years in a similar prime time slot with the revival of Saturday Night’s Main Event.
The first Elite XC show, which is tentatively scheduled for April 26th and likely headlined by Kimbo Slice, will either be the most watched MMA event ever in the United States, or it will be a failure. One could make a strong argument that above and beyond UFC’s first live television special in 2005, where Forrest Griffin and Stephan Bonnar became instant stars by having almost the perfect match at the perfect moment for the sport, this is the most important night, going forward, in the sport’s U.S. history.
If the shows get poor ratings, the entire sport will be stigmatized with the idea that it has its cult popularity and is simply cable TV fare. It will be a huge negative perception blow for a sport which, with its phenomenal growth over the past few years, has been written up as the next NASCAR. Conversely, successful numbers, particularly if they maintain, will entrench MMA as a major sport in this country.
“Mixed martial arts is one of the fastest growing sports in the country and a wildly popular entertainment vehicle for upscale, young adult audiences,” said Kelly Kahl, Senior Executive Vice President of CBS Primetime. “It’s original programming for Saturday night; it’s live, creating an event-atmosphere; and it’s something that hasn’t been seen on network television, until now.”
It’s not a surprise that CBS made a deal for MMA. Both CBS and NBC negotiated for MMA programming for months. CBS’ interest in UFC predated the writers’ strike, while NBC’s interest picked up with the idea of looking for new live programming during the strike. That CBS went with Elite XC over the established UFC is a surprise, and is believed to have happened because Dana White wouldn’t compromise on giving the network control of the broadcast.
White noted earlier this week, before the deal was announced, that he wasn’t going to sign a bad deal for the company, even with a network station. The control issue also likely cost UFC a deal with HBO last year. UFC’s strategy of playing hardball and trying to get the deal on its terms simply wasn’t going to work with a network, but the gamble was that a big player wouldn’t take the chance with an organization that has nowhere near the name recognition and level of mainstream stars.
Because Showtime, part owner of Elite XC, is part of the Viacom family, which owns CBS, they fell into a deal that as a fledgling group, gives them a level of exposure they couldn’t afford to turn down.
“I don’t know why they didn’t get it,” said Gary Shaw, promoter of Elite XC. “If I had to guess, I’d say that it was Dana White. I don’t know that. I don’t worry about the UFC. If the prom queen wants to go out with me, I don’t ask why she isn’t dating the quarterback. I just show up at 8 p.m. at her door. I’ve said all along I think the UFC is great.
“I like the Fertittas and Marc Ratner (UFC Vice President of Regulatory Affairs) is like a brother to me. But the problem is no fighter can be bigger than Dana White or the UFC. For us, the fighters will always be the biggest stars.”
Shaw’s most successful MMA event was the Feb. 16 show in Miami, which drew a 1.9 rating on Showtime. It was the highest rating for a non-UFC MMA event in history, largely due to the unique Kimbo Slice vs. Tank Abbott main event. But that’s only 522,000 viewers, and they’ll need ten times that audience number, if not more, to do competitive numbers on CBS.
The show also sold out the 6,187-seat BankUnited Center in Miami, which benefited from Slice being a hometown star. For CBS events, Shaw said they are looking at running 15,000-seat arenas with the new Prudential Center in Newark being among the venues under consideration for the debut show.
Most of the details of the deal have not been made official. CBS will be paying Elite XC a fee per show. They haven’t agreed to a time slot, although with affiliate news commitments, it would have to be either 8-10 p.m. or 9-11 p.m. The broadcast team hasn’t been agreed to, but both sides will have input into the decision. Shaw said that once the date and the venue are finalized, they would begin finalizing the matches.
Shaw said he expected the shows to be similar to the Elite XC events on Showtime.
“It’s the same type of show,” he said. “I think we do a very good production with competitive fights.”
Another key is that, with so many people watching the first show and presumably so much hype, that if someone makes a good showing, they can become an instant star, similar, to what happened to Griffin stemming from the first Ultimate Fighter finals. The impact of a great match will be multiplied tenfold.
An unknown fighter who does a sensational finish will almost instantly become one of the best known fighters in the country. A genuine match of the year could end up being the most talked about fight in history. Similarly, the affects of a poor show will be magnified like never before.
But it also adds to an over-saturation problem. UFC is producing roughly two shows per month. Elite is now adding four CBS dates to the 16 or so Showtime dates they had planned for this year. That’s a lot of events in a sport with a finite number of stars, and in which the stars can only fight a few times per year.
Even with the deal giving his company the largest television exposure in a business where television exposure is the life blood, Shaw doesn’t feel Elite XC is on the verge of leapfrogging UFC as the top promotion.
“No, I’m a realist,” he said. “UFC is No. 1. I am Pepsi to their Coke, Avis to their Hertz.”
-
ANSWER:
I totally agree with you but there are a few problems that must be ironed out first.
Problems llike the fact most fights are at casinos because casinos guareentee money and venues. Since boxing has 1 minute rest breaks, it is going to be difficult to find sponsers who could plug their ads while trainers are yelling at fighters instructions. think about wrestling. the numbers are great but the demographics are not always the best for pushing. you won't see lexus showing a commercial during WWE,nor will you see high prices on ads. thats why wrestling is on USA and not CBS anymore. (monday night raw). The networks would have to actually have a interest in the sport to push it. with network television its about numbers and ratings. if the fights are not geting ratings then they will pull the plug. if the fights are horrible match ups for a rising star to pad their records, people will turn the channel. Think about the klitchko-imbragomov fight being on FOX. by the 9th round people would have stop watching it. like a football game where its 34-0 first quarter, the numbers will slide and the cost for ads the next go around will be less, because of that. Sure you would watch it on network for exposure, but networks are not fans of the sport, they are bidders.
-
QUESTION:
Wife Vs Mother, terrible Situation for me?
I love my wife as well as Mother. They both have their faults. I try to make a fair judgment on issues. However, It has been more than 4 years and I have been trying to explain to my wife to adjust to the nature of my family. There are things that she will will not like about my mother and so will my mother about my wife, that is just human, as no body's perfect. However, I have tried to convince either of them separately to be calm and respectful to each other. But it seems to work only for few days or weeks. Problem is that I get sandwiched in between. I love them both and It would make a paradise if they can get together at least for few hours in a day. They don't have to spend time with each other much, but just be respectful and do their duties.
My wife will not even cook for me or my family even if i am dying, bcoz she does not like our kitchen. Her parents are rich, so she used to have a better life style than now. However, if the mistake of marrying someone in medium class has been performed, then she should learn to adjust. I have spent a lot of money on outings, there is not a single tourist place in USA that we have not been together after marriage. But still she disrespects me and my family. She does not want to accept her mistakes and in last 4 years have not shown a sign of improvement either. Is it failure on my part? or did i just picked the wrong girl?
People recommend that I should buy a separate house and live nuclear. Is that solution to this problem? or is it just running away from it? How do I leave my mother for a woman whom i have known only for 4 years? Just bcoz I took some wows? So, my mother raised me was only a coincidence and i have no commitment to her when she grows old and helpless? There is no end to dilemma.
I cannot even divorce my wife, as in India, the society creates a big issue on this, plus the family reputation goes down in the city.
What can be done? I have tried all the possible methods and have no results. Any suggestions other than buying a separate house and living nuclear?
Yes, it was an arranged marriage, pretty typical and normal in India. I guess, we both are repenting. However, it's too late now. As when we are away, we also miss each other. We have had some good times as well.
Divorce is not possible bcoz of Indian society. The culture is different than west. People are conservative in my town and my parents will feel guilt for the rest of their life if I divorce. Its a very critical situation of dilemma.
strong: I like your advice. I will try what you said. Hopefully it will work. Thanks
-
ANSWER:
If she has Mars (mangal) in fourth house of horoscope,I assure that your problem will not solve even after going with her at separate home.
If not ,good.Try living separate for 2-3 years ,when she will become MOTHER she will like reunion.
-
QUESTION:
Wife Battle with Mother - I am sandwiched?
I love my wife as well as Mother. They both have their faults. I try to make a fair judgment on issues. However, It has been more than 4 years and I have been trying to explain to my wife to adjust to the nature of my family. There are things that she will will not like about my mother and so will my mother about my wife, that is just human, as no body's perfect. However, I have tried to convince either of them separately to be calm and respectful to each other. But it seems to work only for few days or weeks. Problem is that I get sandwiched in between. I love them both and It would make a paradise if they can get together at least for few hours in a day. They don't have to spend time with each other much, but just be respectful and do their duties.
My wife will not even cook for me or my family even if i am dying, bcoz she does not like our kitchen. Her parents are rich, so she used to have a better life style than now. However, if the mistake of marrying someone in medium class has been performed, then she should learn to adjust. I have spent a lot of money on outings, there is not a single tourist place in USA that we have not been together after marriage. But still she disrespects me and my family. She does not want to accept her mistakes and in last 4 years have not shown a sign of improvement either. Is it failure on my part? or did i just picked the wrong girl?
People recommend that I should buy a separate house and live nuclear. Is that solution to this problem? or is it just running away from it? How do I leave my mother for a woman whom i have known only for 4 years? Just bcoz I took some wows? So, my mother raised me was only a coincidence and i have no commitment to her when she grows old and helpless? There is no end to dilemma.
I cannot even divorce my wife, as in India, the society creates a big issue on this, plus the family reputation goes down in the city.
What can be done? I have tried all the possible methods and have no results. Any suggestions other than buying a separate house and living nuclear?
Yes, my grandparents used to live with us, until they passed away. It is a very traditional culture in India. Like it or not, but it has been dat way for centuries.
Nuclear family = Just my wife, myself and my kids, no parents or siblings living in my house.
I understand that in marriage wows I have to stick with my wife. But, is making new relationships at the cost of breaking old ones, ethical ? One day my wife will be a MIL as well. Would she feel okay, if her son left her alone in the house and lived somewhere else, she would not have anyone to talk with at home, she does not have a job, that's almost like being in hell. Try to place urself in the shoes of MIL and then think.
Why is it so difficult for 2 women to nest in the same place? Guys can hang on to each other so well, they will party and have beer together, irrespective of age.
But, why does a fight exist between Wife and MIL? It's easy to say, move to a different house. If I imagine myself being 70, living alone, no job, no income, nobody to talk with, grand children are far away, damn, that's not something i would prefer when death can knock on my door anytime, do you?
I am neither taking my wife's side, nor my mother, but thinking ethically and placing myself in either of their shoes. The dilemma is that both of them seem to be right.
-
ANSWER:
Get your own house and live with your wife, yes your vows to her do rank above the fact that you were raised by your mother. Your mother's choice to have a child does not indebt that child for the rest of his life.
Do your parents live with your Father's parents?
-
QUESTION:
Have you ever had a Mental Health professional fancy you? What was it like??
I was assigned a new community psychiatric nurse last month after I had personal issues with my old male CPN. I have a new one and she's perhaps the most interesting mental health professional I've ever met. However I've been reading the signals and I have concluded today that she actually fancies me and perhaps wishes to marry me. Whenever I look into her eyes I can actually see a pure sign of 'want' in there [if I've described that right] and she's incredibly nice to me. We don't just talk about "treatment" but she's told me a bit about herself, and she's 35 and married with no children and she's worked in the psychiatric field for 10 years, so it's a case of opposites attract? I honestly think, from the way she is around me, that she's unsatisfied with her marriage and has grown bored. Now she is looking for a more interesting, better looking and more intelligent and perhaps a much younger man [I am 20 years old] to instill some new excitement into her life, but I know she doesn't know how to approach me.
I prefer, and generally do, be chased rather than do the chasing, of course, so I do wonder when she'll get the ability to admit how she feels for me, because I know that her feelings for me by far override her compliance to us just being a so called "professional relationship" and other such rules which prohibit professionals from having genuine human feelings [such as love and sexual attraction] with their proclaimed clients, in my case as a psychiatric service user, not only this, but her marital commitments to her husband even though she's already emotionally cheating on him and perhaps lying to herself, which is the worst thing a person can actually do. In a way, I should really bring this up with her, but as a semifamous pornstar once said "if you keep your fan[s] waiting and wanting, they'll love you more". I think this is 100% true.
However the problem so far is that she won't admit to this yes, but I'm sure given time, she will follow her heart and do the best thing for all of us. When she finally admits to her feelings, I suppose it will be an interesting relationship. I am a big fan of mature relationships and women [or "girls"] around my own age are far too emotionally and mentally immature for me and do not know what they want, when I clearly know what I want, because I have the mental maturity and experience of a 35 year old man, rather than just a mere 20 year old because I'm actually quite a lot different to most my age and we don't relate at all.
Has anybody ever been in a similar situation to me? How did you handle it and what was the outcome? Or do | did you abide by the old professional-client [most commonly known in the doctor-patient sense, but also covers other professionals] code which removes the humanity from you and makes you actually believe in those false social and perhaps legal codes? When it happens, though I really do not wish to be assigned to someone else. Non judgemental feedback would be great, thanks. This is important to me.
-
ANSWER:
John, mate, you are starting to lose contact with reality. You've just described a classic case of erotomania. You're confusing professional interest with romantic intention. She's caring and interested in you, and probably one of the few people who listens to what's going on in your head, but you have to remember that at the end of the day she clocks off and goes home. And doesn't give you another thought. You're setting yourself up for failure and disappointment, and if you even give a hint of what you're feeling to her or anyone else, you're going to be assigned to male staff only for the rest of your life. I am a mental health service user, but I have also worked in community mental health teams and I am telling you, this situation is not what you believe it to be.
I have been in a similar situation, but it was a service user who became infatuated with me. He kept telephoning me, emailing me and turning up outside my house. My supervisor was made aware of this, and it was written in his file. And he was cautioned by the police for harrassment, and later sectioned because he decompensated and became completely psychotic.
You are not well John, and you need to see your psychiatrist. As good as you feel now, when this all hits the fan you are going to be in the depths of despair and I don't want you to go through that alone. SO please for your own sake make an appointment asap.
Boundaries are in place for a reason, they're there to protect her, and they're there to protect you. And the most important boundary here is the professional relationship. You cannot attempt to cross that line and make this relationship anything else. She is your CPN, you are her service user. That's it, it will never go any further. As with my case, the minute you try and do anything to cross that invisible line, she will be forced to take action, both to keep herself safe and to make sure you're getting the treatment you need.
If you even hint at a romantic idea, she's going to have to step down, to protect herself from accusations of abuse and manipulation. Don't force her hand. She clearly likes you and wants to help you, but understand that it isn't the same as being romantically attracted to someone.
I never got over the sight of my service user being dragged away in cuffs by the Police. he still kept screaming 'marry me'. It was heartbreaking and tragic all at once, but in a professional sense, not a personal one. He'd been doing so well in his recovery, it was devastating to see that happen.
If you want her to stay in your life, you have to keep this to yourself. And get over it quickly. It's never going to happen.
-
QUESTION:
What does your experience tell you about this issue ?
Girls in their teenage years aspire to become as beautiful as possible trying to match up to the Ideal beauty queen in their mind. From where do they derive these ideals ? Ofcourse, they pick the vibes sent out by young men. We all know that beauty is Relative. Any woman who aspires to become beautiful does so to gain corresponding attention in return. What these young people often fail to remember is that of all the aspects of their personality, the skin would be the first one to show up signs of ageing. Thus, if being intellectualy sound was the idea of gaining attention in the teenage years, such efforts would reap long benefits as slowly that habbit of being intellectualy sound would become part of the person's character without his or her knowing about it consciously. Thus, all these activities that a person often does in his or her teenage years be it attracting the opposite sex, flirting, trying to look good, taking care of other aspects of grooming all centre around the idea of becoming desireable. Now if we go further into the idea of becoming desireable, it really deserves to be done by a person who has a giver in himself or herself. The logic is simple and that is "Why would a company for example, market or advertise any product which is not going to be beneficial to its customers anyway?". In the same manner, why should a person engage himself or herself to attract any person of opposite sex for a girlfriend or boyfriend if he or she is not going to be commited or loyal to the person whose attention is being sort ? Thus, in the teenage years people are only marketing themselves to find the right life partner but then as they grow into mature adults, they should nourish the same relationship with commitment, loyalty, honesty and sincerity. That would make the whole process more romantic than simply flipping the pages of books giving you tips on flirting or attracting opposite sex without any intention of commitment at the back of the mind.
-
ANSWER:
My experience tells me you've asked this question before.
Seriously, I'm not reading all that wall of text, but from what I glanced at you seem to be saying that people should look deeper than physical beauty. I don't think you'll get many arguments against that.
I would add that you could take out the "girls" in the beginning of your monologue and put the word "people". You can also take out teenagers as many people of a variety of ages get their ideas of what
beauty is, what is attractive, from other people in general, not specifically the opposite sex.
-
QUESTION:
Help please: I've been asked to draft a character reference for my Filipino GF to be issued by her Pastor?
G'day!
As part of her support documentation for application for a visitors visa to Australia my Filipino GF has asked me if I could write a draft for a character reference. This reference will then be edited and signed by her Pastor. I'm guessing here that considering the difficulty I had trying to explain what a character reference is and can do for her visa application that perhaps her Pastor is requesting the draft to get a clearer picture of what we are asking for and the purpose.
Can anyone here assist with:
A/. Writing an explanatory letter for the Pastor.
B/. Writing the draft of the character reference from a Pastor's perspective
C/. Grant her a Visa or tell me how to turn the moon a nice shade of blue? [Please excuse my witticism as I'm somewhat overwhelmed by the extreme difficulty we're experiencing trying to piece together what we hope to be a successful Australian Visa Application.]
My girlfriend is 30 years of age, a volunteer with International Teams [who refused her a reference when she told them I'm a divorced father of four kids], a committed Christian, family orientated [as she has no employment she cycles herself amongst brothers and cousins helping raise their children], and has no formal qualifications other than having completed high school.
I am a single father raising four kids alone. I have two daughters, 10 & 12, who really need a mother/friend living with them showing the right examples for them to grow into decent young women with a good sense of family themselves. I have two sons, 14 & 18, who would greatly benefit from her influence and my example with her.
I need her here to help me maintain some balance within myself too.
I love my girl with all that I am and I know that I would do all that could to give her reason to smile her beautiful smile every day just cos she is truly happy to be with us. I want her to be my Asawa.
We have a mutual Australian friend who has already signed a letter of invitation for her to come to Australia as her guest. She and her husband have also provided documentation to show they can and will support her while she is here.
The only thing we need is something to satisfy the Australian government that my GF WILL return to Philippines at the end of her Visa period. Without a employment commitment this character reference from her Pastor is all we have.
Please can anyone help us?
I guess I'm really at the point of begging for some real assistance now
Other info: I just cannot afford to go to PH myself with my kids and I do not have anyone [that I know well enuff] capable of taking care of my kids while I go alone. Additionally I want my GF & my kids to have some time to get to know and accept each other before asking her to marry me.
-
ANSWER:
Really, I think you should walk into your local MP office and ask for help and complain about ridiculous Visa restrictions. I have run into so many problems trying to get a friend to visit me in the US, it almost drove me crazy. But I am a single guy, so I just gave up and save and travel. But you just cannot, understandably so. Your MP can get the Visa quickly, I promise you. Just be straight and honest. You really have a good case and most MPs really want to do something good once in a while. You know they have to do a lot of terrible things that get hidden away from the public that keeps them awake at night, so they like to do good when they can. I really think you have a shot at getting an expedited Visa. If you go with one of your kids, it will really help. It is easy to say no to somebody over the phone or through email. Take a day off and make an appointment and just visit your MP in person, preferably with one of your daughters. I think they will help you. I really do.
-
QUESTION:
Looking for opinions on the gay marriage vote?
The state I live in will be holding a ballot question looking to overturn the legislation to legalize gay marriage. I believe that homosexuality is a part of the human experience - but am torn for the following reasons:
1.) There are domestic partner laws on the books as well as special protections in our constitution, for which I don't even qualify. Rape against women is indeed a hate crime, but it would only get true justice and attention if I were gay. So I have a bit of a problem putting yet another budget and legislation toward protecting special groups. I've been the victim of prejudice, violence, landlords turning me away, etc. yet there was no recourse for me and there will never be. I wouldn 't want to be in a place where I was not wanted nor accepted either. Another layer of laws is not going to force those to accept homosexual marriages if they already don't.
2.) The two sides of this issue have been pumping out ridiculous ads, have spent well over 3 millions of dollars on this, while my kids can't even get on a computer at school to complete homework assignments. I can't get a decent job, small businesses are folding up by the day, including mine, yet this is where our focus is?
3.) I signed a petition by a "free choice" group to put this in the voters hands, then they put me on all of these Christian mailing lists looking for MONEY! I asked specifically if they were a religious group, they stated no that they were for voters' rights. I got conned and lied to by Christians!
4.) The other side has taken grandparents who are raising their grand kids and single mothers and lumping us together as a group of "misfits". I resent this. I was married, made commitments and was dumped to clean up the mess. I know gay friends that are also embarrassed about this situation and did not think this was appropriate. We got the point that we are to accept different families, but this isn't going to ever settle well with the male-oriented Christian based codes. Getting them out of power would be the better solution for us ALL. They want to live under these Draconian codes, then they should form their own commune and do so in peace. This should be done together, not piece by piece by each special interest group. Divide and conquer still works!
5. With domestic laws on the books, I feel this should be an issue between churches and gay rights groups. As a female, I am not a valued member of the church either! They want my collection money, but not me nor my opinions or knowledge of the scriptures. If Christian groups do not wish to marry gay couples, it's their perogative. I'll do it as I am certified to marry couples within my state. I'm sure if the Catholic Church finds out, I'll probably be ex-communicated.
Overall I am sick to death of this issue. We're never going to get true justice on this Earth.
I really am looking for opinions that are balanced and intelligent. I don't need to hear chauvinistic quotes from a edited re-translated bible written by a bunch of fat monks who lived in all male communes and had no sense of reality. Nor do I need to hear from the other side telling me that I am closed minded. Homosexuality is a part of the human experience, yet if we were all gay, our species may not perpetuate itself and that part does go against nature. But the homophobes won't look at this logically that indeed it does exist and is "normal" within certain parameters. The science around this is completely lost and it is all too emotional at this point. I take my right to vote very seriously, obviously I am struggling with this and reaching out, I absolutely see both sides of this, but neither side is luring me in with any type of logic.
I spent many years socializing in a group that included gay couples. The perspectives I heard from these intelligent professional committed loving folks is not even close to the message the gay groups are putting out.
I just don't think either side has presented a decent intelligent argument here - it's all based upon emotion and this is not a good way to go about politics. I deliberately put this question in this category so I might get a variety of answers. So what do you think?
Thanks for your answers & opinions. What I'd like to figure out is what the difference between "Domestic Partner" and "Marriage". Traditionally marriage has been formed around religious beliefs. This is where I'm having an issue mixing religion & politics. Then I guess it should go through - this issue should not have been on the table at the outset.
I see abortion the same way, overturning Roe v. Wade is actually about states' rights, not abortion. Yet I don't think this should be up to politcs either. See why I'm confused - it's NOT about the actual issue - it's the approriateness of our even voting on this stuff.
If we simply remove the word "man", or replace it with the word "citizen", and truly live by it, then it would be "freedom for all" and I guess we wouldn't need to be voting on this type of stuff. peace.
By the way, Jesus isn't voting here in 2009. He hung out with sinners & Lepers, he seemed pretty open-minded. He also hung out with kids - I wonder what we would think of him doing that in this day in age. WWJD? Good question.
Whether we believe he is the son of God or not, according to census records, he existed, had a great message and has shown us actions . The Bible is just words. The Parables speak more loudly putting words into actions. peace.
-
ANSWER:
I believe what Jesus said we should do, Love one another no matter what we think and he would take care of the rest, We need to stop referring to them as those people they are our brothers and sisters.Its something they have to deal with not me im fine with what some one else does or wants.